Note that in this article, Dr. Doshi tried to downplay vaccines’ effectiveness by arguing for including cases not identified as Covid-19 in the count. Highly problematic.
-
-
I will not waste my time with "debunkers", but I read the Doshi piece in the context of his body of work asking for clinical trial data sharing, which I think we can all agree would be beneficial. Well maybe not Dr. Gorski since I assume he doesn't analyze any data.
3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
If you read Dr. Gorski’s piece you would see he agrees with transparency in trials. The issue is misrepresenting vaccines data in the quest for it. I think all of us can agree that’s wrong. At least, I hope so.
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @IoanaA_Cristea and
Actually, reading Doshi’s
#CovidVaccine piece in the context of his past body of work makes it worse, not better. He’s been downplaying vaccine efficacy based on bad arguments at least since the H1N1 pandemic of 2009-10. It’s his MO.3 replies 4 retweets 46 likes -
What exactly are your contributions in this space? Transparency, data sharing, sponsorship bias? And your own financial COI declarations?
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IoanaA_Cristea @doritmi and
I have no sponsors and no financial COIs in this space-or any other space, for that matter. Nice try at the pharma shill gambit, though.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shill_gambit …2 replies 5 retweets 46 likes -
I meant scientific contributions, it was obvious. But also a rhetorical question, since google already told me you had none.
5 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IoanaA_Cristea @doritmi and
I didn’t see any publications by you in PubMed about vaccines either, but that doesn’t stop you. I bet you didn’t even read the post.
0 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @J_EmpyreanGoals @gorskon and
Hahaha. As I said, I was talking about Doshi’s work on transparency and data sharing. Where I also have interests. Hopefully, you are not a debunker too, so that we can maintain the illusion you read what you comment one.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Ah, yes. Another example of the scorn academics heap on skeptics for “debunking.” It’s been an issue dating back to Carl Sagan.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @J_EmpyreanGoals and
Oh, I am sorry, your google profile seemed to indicate you were also an academic? Must have been a mistake, because you would not just be playing the convenient role? Hahaha.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @IoanaA_Cristea @gorskon and
He is an academic, and pointing out false and misleading information is an important role for academics. Especially vaccine misinformation which can result in people dying
0 replies 2 retweets 7 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.