In this case, just reading Dr. Doshi’s article without the additional background can lead people astray. That’s exactly the problem with his work, which can lead people outside the field to false conclusions. (I don’t know if you’re outside the field, it’s a general comment).
-
-
And exactly what would be Dr. Gorski's competences here? What would recommend him as an expert in this? Surely not publications on the topic and definitely not any scientific work I am aware of?
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
He has been debunking exactly this kind of scientific misinformation for decades. And note that his post draws on experts in the field for the points about the trials. He certainly has more on-point expertise than Dr. Doshi.
2 replies 2 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @IoanaA_Cristea and
Note that in this article, Dr. Doshi tried to downplay vaccines’ effectiveness by arguing for including cases not identified as Covid-19 in the count. Highly problematic.
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
I will not waste my time with "debunkers", but I read the Doshi piece in the context of his body of work asking for clinical trial data sharing, which I think we can all agree would be beneficial. Well maybe not Dr. Gorski since I assume he doesn't analyze any data.
3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
If you read Dr. Gorski’s piece you would see he agrees with transparency in trials. The issue is misrepresenting vaccines data in the quest for it. I think all of us can agree that’s wrong. At least, I hope so.
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @IoanaA_Cristea and
Actually, reading Doshi’s
#CovidVaccine piece in the context of his past body of work makes it worse, not better. He’s been downplaying vaccine efficacy based on bad arguments at least since the H1N1 pandemic of 2009-10. It’s his MO.3 replies 4 retweets 46 likes -
What exactly are your contributions in this space? Transparency, data sharing, sponsorship bias? And your own financial COI declarations?
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IoanaA_Cristea @doritmi and
I have no sponsors and no financial COIs in this space-or any other space, for that matter. Nice try at the pharma shill gambit, though.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shill_gambit …2 replies 5 retweets 46 likes -
I meant scientific contributions, it was obvious. But also a rhetorical question, since google already told me you had none.
5 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
I didn’t see any publications by you in PubMed about vaccines either, but that doesn’t stop you. I bet you didn’t even read the post.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @J_EmpyreanGoals @gorskon and
Hahaha. As I said, I was talking about Doshi’s work on transparency and data sharing. Where I also have interests. Hopefully, you are not a debunker too, so that we can maintain the illusion you read what you comment one.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.