The combination of weaponizing #VAERS reports plus accusing those who try to put those reports into context of "minimizing" or "ignoring" those reports, instead of what we are doing, putting them into context and showing why many (but not all) are not indicative of causation. 6/
-
-
And overstating adverse events seems to be his thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dr Gellad had no qualms about pushing HCQ a year ago “just in case it could help” while disregarding adverse effects, but now that we have actual, robustly-scientific interventions he seems to be against them “just in case they could harm.” Quite the cognitive dissonance.pic.twitter.com/LI6oLRIE7D
-
Ah - a HCQ pusher. That explains a lot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's the over-amplification VAERS is the "One Report To Rule Them All". In Feb,
@ENirenberg wrote on Deplatform Disease VAERS isn't the only surveillance mechanism yet too many* are suggesting otherwise. *Carlson, Wolf, Berenson (for starters
)https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/an-overview-of-us-vaccine-pharmacovigilance …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
15/15