It is truly depressing to see straw men arguments like this from academics. This is a straw man so massive that, were it to be set on fire, the crew of the ISS could see it easily. NO ONE is "ignoring" #CovidVaccine adverse events. NO ONE is *advocating* that we "ignore" AEs. 1/ https://twitter.com/walidgellad/status/1390260528988270592 …
-
-
By February, antivaxxers were weaponizing reports of death to
#VAERS without consideration of baseline mortality rates, exactly as I (and others) had predicted that they would. 8/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-as-dangerous-continue-apace-vaers-edition/ …Show this thread -
This effort to assume causation for all
#VAERS reports continued apace, with the added feature that antivaxxers love to use raw numbers without normalizing to population or doses of vaccine administered, the better to make the numbers seem scarier. 9/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/02/17/misuse-of-the-vaers-database-by-antivaxxers-continues-cardiac-edition/ …Show this thread -
The weaponization of
#VAERS is particularly odd, given that CDC and FDA noted a one-in-a-million (at the time) adverse event associated with the J&J vaccine in a month and a half of its use, and then paused its distribution. Some "ignoring." 10/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/04/14/covid-19-vaccine-safety-monitoring-the-jj-vaccine-and-blood-clots/ …Show this thread -
So Dr. Gellad is correct. It IS a difficult time to discuss vaccine adverse events, but not for the reasons he apparently believes. The press sensationalizes and antivaxxers weaponize any dramatic report, whether causation is likely or not. 11/
Show this thread -
Dr. Gellad portrays this as "ignoring" adverse events and appears to defend
@thackerpd (who is NOT an honest broker). It is not, and I hope this brief thread helps educate WHY discussing#CovidVaccine adverse events is difficult. It's not because we're "ignoring" them. 12/12Show this thread -
Forgot to mention: In addition to my two blogs,
@AboutPediatrics is an excellent resource for the discussion of how antivaxxers have traditionally weaponized#VAERS to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about vaccines. 13/13https://vaxopedia.orgShow this thread -
Welp, this is not encouraging. Clearly the good doctor doesn’t want to hear criticism. 14/14pic.twitter.com/8c3m6TZ0x8
Show this thread -
And…who’s imputing malign intent? I emphasized that I was assuming that he didn’t know he was using an antivax talking point. Anyway, One block deserves another; so, sadly, I blocked him back.
15/15pic.twitter.com/qEtpAyrFUn
Show this thread -
Context. He was responding to Thacker and basically amplifying his message. 16/16pic.twitter.com/rxih2QRBTZ
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.