There should be no doubt now that the thrombotic events with AZ vaccine are a true risk. This study uses national healthcare data from Denmark and Norway. Searching hospital records, they find cerebral venous thrombosis of 1 in 40,000https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1114?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=hootsuite&utm_content=sme&utm_campaign=usage …
It uses antivax talking points very similar to ones I've seen antivaxxers use for many years about other vaccines.
-
-
Can you give an example?
-
Pointing to the swine flu of 1976, whether justified or not, has been an antivax favorite for at least 20 years. The article is so bad that I might write a blog post on the antivax talking points being (I assume unknowingly) parroted.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which “talking points”? As far as I could tell, it is factual and gives a reasoned opinion. Are we obliged to suppress our own reasoned opinions because of the specter of anti-vaxxers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.