Retract, not retreat. Damn autocorrect…
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunately many of the sites that ran articles about the "Stanford cardiologist" will not retract them, & the lie will live on. This feels like a repeat of the charlatan who claimed to be an advisor to Stanford Med School who went on Fox last yr & hyped HCQ. He's still cited.
-
Someone will probably make $$$ claiming that this “study” was suppressed because THEY™ don’t want us to know the truth! This claim will surely include Gates and/or Soros.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And not because the author was unknown at the place he claimed to work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thx for this!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So
@ElsevierConnect is retracting a paper because of “misleading citations, a peer-review without the customary standards of review”. Nice. -
What about the (in)famous study from Gautret et al. on HCQ? There is a review stating "This is a non-informative manuscript with gross methodological shortcomings"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920302338 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

