About that "study" on masks in the fringe speculative journal Medical Hypotheses...besides its being utter BS, its author Baruch Vainshelboim doesn't even work for @Stanford or the Palo Alto VA! https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-629043235973 …
-
-
The fact that you use the term "antimaskers" is part of the problem. You need to understand: those that you call "antimaskers" are not necessarily against the effectiveness, they are often against the mandate. Which has no scientific support. Additionally....
-
Additionally those that advocate for mandates also advocate lockdowns. You're backed by "science" - theoretical science. Devoid of risk management,in regards to mental health and economics.The word 'antimaskers' is a notion meant to simplify a VERY complex issue. It hurts people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.