About that "study" on masks in the fringe speculative journal Medical Hypotheses...besides its being utter BS, its author Baruch Vainshelboim doesn't even work for @Stanford or the Palo Alto VA! https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-629043235973 …
-
-
Third, because Baruch Vainshelboim appears not to have an affiliation with
@Stanford, it's not a "Stanford study," either. Pointing out that it's not a study, likely not from Stanford, and definitely not an "NIH study" is very important to counter antimaskers' citing it as such. -
The fact that you use the term "antimaskers" is part of the problem. You need to understand: those that you call "antimaskers" are not necessarily against the effectiveness, they are often against the mandate. Which has no scientific support. Additionally....
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
While denigrating expertise generally. Somehow they get it both ways.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.