I can answer this one. The study is not a peer reviewed or from a major university. It’s a textbook example of a dodgy source. Let me explain. https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1383218165165936643 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
It was easy to find the url for the study because anti-vax and conspiracy theory Twitter has gone wild for it.pic.twitter.com/82QScBYdkD
1 reply 22 retweets 344 likesShow this thread -
It’s by someone called Baruch Vainshelboim. He seems to be a sports physiologist with some link to Stanford. But the publication in which his work appears is not peer-reviewed, and it has weird spelling mistakes and footnotes with no page refs.
8 replies 30 retweets 487 likesShow this thread
Replying to @DrMatthewSweet
It's worse than you think.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/04/21/medical-hypotheses-is-back-and-its-pushing-antimask-disinformation/ …
1 reply
1 retweet
8 likes
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.