thank you very much, some ### nomask antivax ### sent me that study, useful link to shut them down.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@roccogalatilaw BUT THAT DID NOT STOP ROCCO GALATI FROM POSTING IT YESTERDAY MORNING. Who funded it? Who pays the author’s salary? There were no co-authors. It should be retracted!
New conversation -
-
-
Association with Stanford no longer confers credibility after tgis last year, but you had me at Medical Hypotheses.pic.twitter.com/0cJSnxzcNT
-
Well the shortage of publication venues for crackpot ideas is such a major problem in medicine, and this journal exists to deal with that problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ugh, I just saw someone sharing this paper on facebook a few days ago as "an NIH study showing the dangers of facemasks." And she's a nurse practitioner.
-
I’m absolutely stunned how many medical “professionals” are duped by misinformation.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Another critique of Baruch Vainshelboim’s article. Maybe Rocco Galati should read it!https://techstartups.com/2021/04/18/nih-publish-medical-hypothesis-dr-baruch-vainshelboim-suggests-long-term-wearing-facemasks-strong-potential-devastating-health-consequences/ …
-
Stanford University denounces study!https://twitter.com/TerryPolevoy/status/1385158283472867328 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oo my friend posted this on Facebook. The paper was horrible. It cited low quality or outdated sources or just no source at all. Cited many .org and websites. Not sure how it got published in the first place.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.