It's intentional projection. Basically, antivaxxers want to be seen as "vaccine safety activists"; so they leap to claim any legitimate scientist discussing vaccine safety as one of their own, to falsely paint themselves as just doing the same thing. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
It's basically a technique that goes back at least as far as
@JennyMcCarthy 13 years ago, when she kept saying, "I'm not antivaccine; I'm pro-safe vaccine" as she spread bad science, pseudoscience, and misinformation about vaccines. 3/Show this thread -
Of course, these "vaccine safety warrior" antivaxxers NEVER admit that even a SINGLE vaccine is safe and effective enough to be recommended for general use. 4/4
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, nobody should be watching Fox believing they are hearing anything close to the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a ridiculous stretch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Irony: Jay Bhattacharya’s testimony is being used along with notorious anti-vaxxer James Lyons-Weiler in two lawsuits against public health protections.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17141421/south-bay-united-pentecostal-church-v-newsom/ …
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17376935/matthew-brach-v-gavin-newsom/ …pic.twitter.com/eTT3ld4TFl
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This goes to my point that anti-vaxxers round up risks from 0.008% to 100% and round down effectiveness from 95% to 0%. They apparently pulled their math knowledge out of the same part of the gastrointestinal tract as they did their science knowledge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.