Would that that were actually the case! What about food and water? Those are interventions. What about activity or exercise? That’s an intervention. Without those “interventions” You can bet that even the healthiest body won’t stay healthy for long. 1/https://twitter.com/organicdot/status/1378714424526049284 …
-
-
Dorothy’s attitude is quite emblematic of how quacks view nature, though. The body is “perfect” and needs no “unnatural” intervention to remain healthy. Yet, even if we avoid disease, we still all grow old, lose that health, and eventually die. THAT’s nature! 3/
Show this thread -
It’s also emblematic of how quacks victim blame and shame. Always under their appeal to the “natural” is the idea that of you’re sick it’s your own fault for not eating the right foods, living the right lifestyle, doing the right things. 4/4
Show this thread -
Also, it can also serve as a “just-so” narrative. If you die from an infectious disease or come down with another malady, then, previous appearances aside, you must not have been truly “healthy.” 5/5
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My grandfather died in 1918. He was 36 yrs. old. He was a big strapping man. He was a boxer in college. Both of his brothers died too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.