It's particularly amusing that the best he can come up with is just an ad hominem about only *one* of my sources. He can't refute any of the information in my post. 1/ https://twitter.com/PhilWMagness/status/1377485369558638592 …
-
-
Seriously, one notes that Mr. Magness does not deny that
@aier is funded by the Koch brothers and other right wing climate science denying astroturf organizations. The reason? Because he can't. 3/Show this thread -
Anyway, judge my post on
#GreatBarringtonDeclaration and@aier for yourself, noting that the Mr. Magness can't refute any of it; so he focuses repeatedly like a laser on one citation whose author he thinks he can attack. Pathetic, but amusing. 4/4https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/great-barrington-declaration/ …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.