He’s got a point there...https://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/1376579655793266697 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To me, the question is: Was Ioannidis known to cut methodological corners and engage in personal attacks before COVID? Because he didn't have a reputation for doing either of those things.
-
I think you can see the gears turning where Ioannidis's normally respected contrarianism not being respected increasingly made him lose the plot and resort to whining in his former journal
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, he’s been defending Götzsche, and vice-versa.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I remember Angora Rabbit had a really great post on SBM 7-8 years ago warning that Ioannodis was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Damn, was she ever right (I’m EBMOD just for reference).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There was a paper: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False but Why Most Published Biomedical Research Findings Are False might have been rather more precise (whether true or not). Are most published research findings in physics, chemistry, etc false?
-
It’s not even true for biomedicine. That paper relies on some very dodgy assumptions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.