A quote that caught my eye from an essay published 8/25/2020. Full link here, to ensure I am not quoting anything out of context. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/ …pic.twitter.com/xo3IThXyBr
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There’s no shortage of material at least since the pandemic started. Look at these two quotes. Do you think the second accurately characterized the first?pic.twitter.com/fPSSyrGkCP
Or this nugget- which he has expressed multiple times- that covid deaths are inflated because doctors fill out death certificates wrong.pic.twitter.com/H6GFJqZCIW
He is not alone. Many scientists I respect ended up writing bonkers, at both sides of the Covid extremes. Will take years to heal. An epistemic long Covid.
True. But some who underestimated covid initially (Paul Offit) comes to mind, recognized the error and admitted it. I only bring this up to contrast his honorable position with those who doubled down on their errors or tried to deny them all together.
His "work" on the pandemic is proof that it is far harder to do good science than to criticize the work of others.
I've been skeptical of Ioannidis ever since I re-analyzed one of his data sets and found it was wrong, in 2013. He goes for big headlines and cherry-picks datahttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23282352/
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.