When you accuse people of being antivaxxers @gorskon you provide evidence that anyone can evaluate themselves (statements, articles, interviews, actions, etc.) If I accuse you of being an antivaxxer w/out evidence & you deny it & I say "denial=guilt" you'd reject that argument.https://twitter.com/gorskon/status/1370154131206369281 …
-
-
I take Shermers opinions on anything with a few grains of salt, actually entire blocks of salt. The same man who was kicked off of youtube for his white nationalism & racism Shermer called an ' articulate 'podcaster'. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/youtube-david-duke-richard-spencer-stefan-molyneux-removed-a9593051.html …pic.twitter.com/Dsrt3gZQGy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shermer is literally arguing that the logic being put forth as denial equals evidence is wrong You are actually agreeing with him by insisting that we can use previous anecdotal evidence to come to the conclusion.
-
He's right, but it's a strawman. If you go back through all the tweets, the claim that 'denial = evidence' was never made. This is a simply (and probably purposeful) failing in set theory. All racists deny their racism (
@gorskon's claim) != all who deny racism are racist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
