"Anti-vaxxers" is a term I normally don’t use. In my vaccine book I use “vaccine deniers.” But when people argue that we do not need corona vaccines, which is sheer non-scientific nonsense, it is appropriate to call them “anti-vaxxers.” https://scientificfreedom.dk/news/
-
-
Replying to @PGtzsche1
So, this is generally true but not this time? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
pic.twitter.com/DutPRAk7kB
2 replies 5 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @wushurabbit @PGtzsche1
IKR? It's utterly hilarious to me that the eminent Prof. Gøtzsche can't understand where antivaxxers and quacks got the idea that he was on their side!
3 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @PGtzsche1
Antivaxxers is a term used to scary little man like you, dear. Nobody is anti-something, little man. The question is simple, you can answer with a simple YES or NO: Is the science is comprimised except for the COVID science?
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wushurabbit @PGtzsche1
Prof. Gøtzsche should ask himself why he attracts antivaxxers like this so much.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @PGtzsche1
Uh, just like the mafia. Since PG has touched pharmaceutical interests, you try to discredit him by putting up anti-vax labels. Simple.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're a very silly person.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
