Are you also taking issue with @wsj publishing dangerous nonsense on its editorial page?
-
-
Replying to @mikejohansenmd @VPrasadMDMPH and
If Facebook had this truth vetting system in place in 2019, how might its truth reviewers have handled this piece https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762386 …?
4 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @RogueRad @VPrasadMDMPH and
This might have made it to the Facebook Supreme Court?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mikejohansenmd @VPrasadMDMPH and
In a parallel universe, they may have banned
@ChristosArgyrop for claiming Covid-19 was more dangerous than the flu in February 20204 replies 1 retweet 21 likes -
Replying to @RogueRad @mikejohansenmd and
Facebook’s truth reviewers would have banned me in March 2020 for claiming we should be wearing masks
10 replies 7 retweets 74 likes -
-
Replying to @gorskon @mikejohansenmd and
Hypothetical. Don’t take it too literally David
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Those who have blocked 50% of med twitter are now crying about censorship? Interesting.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @gorskon and
Dude! I haven’t blocked anyone!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Not you.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I think we all know whom Jonathan was referring to.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
