What he’s saying reflects the consensus of the physicians and immunologists that decide it. It’s what the Israeli decision is based on. Presenting it as motivated by safety concerns would be misrepresenting it.
-
-
Replying to @doritmi @noorchashm and
And to remind you, RFK jr. that you’re approaching humbly and with fawning is not a physician or immunologist, either. In fact, he has a lot less training in it than the many people correcting you, including
@ENirenberg. Doesn’t seem to bother you.2 replies 2 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @ENirenberg and
No. Because I think he operates from a place of profound principle and decency…..unlike you people. He needs to fix some of his science, but his moral compass works well…unlike yours. Open my eyes and read the full letter I wrote him. Maybe you’ll get my point. But I doubt.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
I read the whole letter. You lost me at this point, which is facile at best. Nothing is “mechanistically” simple about SARS-CoV-2, the pathogenesis of COVID-19, or the variety and breadth of the host responses to infection (which can persist long after virus replication ends).pic.twitter.com/6WaqFOqkou
1 reply 6 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @angie_rasmussen @doritmi and
Far simpler than HIV Gorski. Get a clue. smh! If you can't read the whole analysis put a lid on your garbage can.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @angie_rasmussen and
Considering the language you’re using against world experts, I would humbly suggest you delete your tweets, take a step back from social media, and seriously reconsider your strategy, Dr Hooman. The path you’re on leads to a dark place.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @angie_rasmussen and
“World experts?” Right. I know a few. We should not be indiscriminately vaccinating the infected in the midst of an outbreak! And frankly I’ve learned enough to know many “experts” are too much ego and not enough ethics.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/05/covid-vaccine-side-effects-three-times-common-have-had-virus/ …
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @angie_rasmussen and
The suggestion was made in good faith. Your behaviour has not been good: your language towards colleagues frankly unacceptable, your courting of anti-vax advocates disappointing. And it’s been deteriorating. You need to take a step back. Please. This path doesn’t end well.
2 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @noorchashm and
Please take this seriously. You need to step back. Re-evaluate. It seems like you’re in a bad place. And it’s manifesting in behaviour and tweets you will likely regret. We all need to step back from time to time. I humbly suggest you need a break.
2 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @noorchashm and
I tried
pic.twitter.com/fgs4OAdrmX
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes
Yeah I blocked him, and he appears to have blocked me back. He also sent me a very angry email in which he cc’d my chairman and his lawyers.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.