The good news, at least, is that with the Twitter misinformation tag coming, tweets like Dr Hooman’s, which aren’t based on any evidence, but spread fear, will be labeled as such. Baby steps.
-
-
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @gorskon
The most shocking and terrifying aspect of information exchange in this day and age is arrogant MDs and PhDs who want to censor and quash ANY concerns about consumer and patient safety. THAT, is the terrifying dimension of the sick psychology you folks are promoting. Truly sick!
8 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @AlastairMcA30
Criticizing YOUR ideas on open social media forums ≠ "censoring and quashing ANY concerns about consumer and patient safety"
2 replies 2 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AlastairMcA30
You're not criticizing. You're demonizing. Despicable. Blind. Devoid of reason. Boorish, at best. A disgrace to the degree after the name! We DO NOT vaccinate persons with active infections - especially when the disease caused by the pathogen is an inflammatory disease itself!
6 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Where has he “demonized”you? Please share.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Do not indiscriminately vaccinate persons with recent or occult SARS-CoV-2 infections. You will harm an as yet indeterminate some of them.
#JBartonWilliams6 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
George3031301 Retweeted George3031301
Dr. Hooman, your recommendations are completely in line with the CDC ACIP Feb 10 recommendations: 1. Don’t vaccinate people who have Active COVID-19. 2. People who have recently had Covid-19 may wait months before vaccination.https://twitter.com/George3031301/status/1367069811260469248?s=20 …
George3031301 added,
George3031301 @George3031301Here are two images. The 1st image is a diagram (version 4) that attempts to illustrate the CDC recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines for people who have or had COVID-19 (ACIP Feb. 10). The 2nd image is the actual CDC text. Feedback welcome. source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/clinical-considerations.html … pic.twitter.com/KNmAWZyXTJ3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @George3031301 @noorchashm and
That’s incorrect. While no one would intentionally vaccinate an ill patient, its only because it unnecessary not because its harmful. Also the CDC says to wait only to until the illness resolves to vaccinate. The standard tome for that is 10 days. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/clinical-considerations.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @noorchashm and
ACIP (Feb 10 & March 3) states that there is no minimum interval between infection and vaccination. And that, if a person desires, they may delay vaccination for months. 6-8 months certainly seems to fit that description. In your judgement is this a safe recommendation?pic.twitter.com/llviPDfV2R
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @George3031301 @mmelgar09 and
It’s better. But they are not YET admitting that vaccinating the infected indiscriminately poses a risk of harm to some.
@DrWoodcockFDA@CDCDirector@US_FDA@CDCgov@pfizer@moderna_tx…WHY? Remember#JBartonWilliams2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're doing exactly the same thing antivaxxers do: Weaponize deaths to peddle your agenda.https://thewashingtonstandard.com/doctor-mocks-anti-vaxxers-while-getting-experimental-covid-jab-dies-days-later-video/ …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @George3031301 and
U're blind and deaf when if come to the problem of iatrogenic harm. Bc our med system is dominantly focused on efficacy and $$. It only pays lip service to safety - these folks R doing what they do bc U R not doing your job. Efficacy and Safety must be on equal footing.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.