I think speaking up for protecting people reflects ethics. And challenging science deniers involves speaking up for science.
-
-
I speak up for science. If anyone denies the efficacy of vaccines, I will correct them….including RFK Jr. I know vaccines well. And I understand the power of mRNA technology.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
And yet, you rejected a 1.2 million people study without pointing to real problems with it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Insufficient power.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
You’re not a statistician; so I’m tempted to tell you to “stay in your damned lane.” Instead, I’ll simply say this: Show us the power calculation. Prove to me this study is “underpowered.”
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
So here’s your chance, Dr. N. Put up or shut up. PROVE the study was “underpowered” to detect a safety signal predicted by your hypothesis.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Impossible on Twitter. Sorry.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it’s not. However, I also note that you have a blog, just as I do. You could easily do the power calculation there and Tweet out a link.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The vast majority benefit from vaccination. Well powered to demonstrate that! Yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So prove to me that it’s underpowered to detect safety signals predicted by your hypothesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Heck, let’s get more granular. List the SPECIFIC outcomes your hypothesis predicts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.