I’ve watched for a week as you’ve narrowly danced around calling vaccines the real threat while always moving the goalposts. This is not a normal drug trial, this is not normal testing conditions or operating procedure. That doesn’t mean there’s a conspiracy.pic.twitter.com/80WlrdOyKG
-
-
Replying to @ASRothstein @noorchashm and
The processes have been expedited but the data has been collected. The investigations into adverse events have occurred. Questions have been asked. You can say you would have also asked for answers to x,y, and z, but instead you’ve spread and amplified disinformation and fear.
2 replies 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @ASRothstein @doritmi and
Stay in your own damn lane! Damn jokers with ZERO qualification to opine! Stay in your own lane!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Goal post moving alert: while I am just a lawyer, I had a concentration in bioethics and health law. Please provide detailed examples of data that acip and cdc are ignoring to create reassurance that would be sufficient to support your claims of negligence. No RFK jr.
1 reply 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @ASRothstein @doritmi and
The vaccination of persons with occult or recent infection would exacerbate COVID-19 disease or cause thromboembolic event. Neither of which will be classified as "vaccine related". The following may get you closer to understanding my point.https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3720 …
9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @ASRothstein and
Wow, that’s really dumb. You must be desperate, because that doesn’t support your hypothesis at all. It’s about coinfection, not vaccines.
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ASRothstein and
Clearly you are not a cellular immunologist. Stay on your own lane David. Write a blog.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @ASRothstein and
Perhaps not, but I am PhD molecular and cellular biologist in addition to being a cancer surgeon. You should be able to explain to me how a paper about co-infection with two different viruses is relevant to your hypothesis. Try me.
4 replies 3 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ASRothstein and
Exactly that you do not see the scientific relevance of this, tells me that you are not a cellular immunologist - and are thus unqualified…. Stick with bloggin’ Dave.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
You know, if you had an on point answer and really wanted to make your case to the public via social media, you would just make the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes
Exactly. Dr. N’s studied refusal to make a coherent argument backed by scientific evidence other than just saying, “Trust me, I’m an immunologist and you’re not” for his #ScreenB4Vaccine concept tells me that he is incapable of doing so.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.