no. i mean he spreads misinformation about vaccines. did you watch acip today?
-
-
Replying to @mcfunny @AlastairMcA30 and
Yeah. It was great. “Unrelated. Safe. Unrelated. Effective” Right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @mcfunny and
It was in depth, thorough, and used evidence. That matters.
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes -
No. It was designed to reassure the public . It was not designed to be critical.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
I’ve watched for a week as you’ve narrowly danced around calling vaccines the real threat while always moving the goalposts. This is not a normal drug trial, this is not normal testing conditions or operating procedure. That doesn’t mean there’s a conspiracy.pic.twitter.com/80WlrdOyKG
3 replies 3 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @ASRothstein @noorchashm and
The processes have been expedited but the data has been collected. The investigations into adverse events have occurred. Questions have been asked. You can say you would have also asked for answers to x,y, and z, but instead you’ve spread and amplified disinformation and fear.
2 replies 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @ASRothstein @doritmi and
We should not be indiscriminately vaccinating the infected in the midst of an outbreak! Period! The unifected, yes! And rapidly. The infected, NO!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @ASRothstein and
Yes, that's your opinion. One with no evidence behind it. One for which you have looked up deaths to blame on
#vaccines, with no evidence, or against evidence. One for which you are willing to support people working to scare everybody from#covid19#vaccines. It's not helping.1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @ASRothstein and
Stay in your own damn lane! U have no idea what you’re talking about when it come to ensuring that our utilitarian constructs do not cause minority harm. Quite atrocious for a person of your cultural and academic background!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Technically, to be in this lane shouldn't you have attended the meetings where the data has been discussed?
5 replies 2 retweets 14 likes
Or, at the very least, he should have reviewed the data and the slides from the presentation, which are freely accessible on the @CDCgov website. He has not. He is uninformed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.