That's a really bad example. Vaccines adverse events are highly monitored. Deaths are looked at closely. You're looking at a situation where people are looking at the evidence - and not seeing what you claimed. In fact, it's going the other way.https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/02/20/world/covid-19-coronavirus#one-vaccine-shot-could-be-enough-for-people-whove-already-had-covid-19-studies-suggest …
-
-
Afterward, she started showing up on antivax websites with "bothsidesism" galore, in which she accepted the claims of "vaccine injury" at face value and railed against critics. No wonder Dr. N liked her. https://www.vaccinechoiceprayercommunity.org/blog/a-nurse-of-22-years-speaks-out-about-a-mumps-outbreak-within-her-fully-vaccinated-family …
-
Interesting. I’ll listen to this later, but that’s interesting background.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
