Dr. Armat clearly doesn't understand how VAERS works or how in fact, in actuality, the number of reports of those adverse events is actually lower than what we would expect from random chance alone. Here, I'll teach him. https://twitter.com/RayArmat/status/1366404092021665794 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
The bottom line is that VAERS is not a good argument in favor of
@noorchashm's hypothesis. If anything, VAERS reports have been far less numerous than one would expect if there were zero relationship between#COVID19Vaccine and cardiovascular events.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/02/17/misuse-of-the-vaers-database-by-antivaxxers-continues-cardiac-edition/ …3 replies 5 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm
The good news, at least, is that with the Twitter misinformation tag coming, tweets like Dr Hooman’s, which aren’t based on any evidence, but spread fear, will be labeled as such. Baby steps.
2 replies 4 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @gorskon
The most shocking and terrifying aspect of information exchange in this day and age is arrogant MDs and PhDs who want to censor and quash ANY concerns about consumer and patient safety. THAT, is the terrifying dimension of the sick psychology you folks are promoting. Truly sick!
8 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon
Dr. Hooman. That which has been asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You have provided no evidence for your claim. We have provided evidence that it is incorrect. No amount of name-calling from your side changes those facts, I’m afraid.
4 replies 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @gorskon
Before the 2 Boeing 737MAXX aircrafts crashed, there was no evidence of the prognosticated design flaw at Boeing. The kind of evidence you are asking for will come when the harm is a fait accompli....We CAN be intelligent, thoughtful, decent and efficient. Try it!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's a really bad example. Vaccines adverse events are highly monitored. Deaths are looked at closely. You're looking at a situation where people are looking at the evidence - and not seeing what you claimed. In fact, it's going the other way.https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/02/20/world/covid-19-coronavirus#one-vaccine-shot-could-be-enough-for-people-whove-already-had-covid-19-studies-suggest …
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
The crash happen a few days to a week or two after the vaccination....
#JBartonWilliams Disgusting and dangerous that any "professional" would come close to defending this indiscriminate vaccination of Americans with infections. Stay in your own lane Dorit!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And Dr. Williams' doctor did not agree with your belief about his death, nor, apparently, do other experts. You're taking an unrelated death and trying to use it to support your belief. Like anti-vaccine activists who blame vaccines for SIDS do.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
Yes, that's exactly what it's like.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.