Dr. Armat clearly doesn't understand how VAERS works or how in fact, in actuality, the number of reports of those adverse events is actually lower than what we would expect from random chance alone. Here, I'll teach him. https://twitter.com/RayArmat/status/1366404092021665794 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
The bottom line is that VAERS is not a good argument in favor of
@noorchashm's hypothesis. If anything, VAERS reports have been far less numerous than one would expect if there were zero relationship between#COVID19Vaccine and cardiovascular events.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/02/17/misuse-of-the-vaers-database-by-antivaxxers-continues-cardiac-edition/ …3 replies 5 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm
The good news, at least, is that with the Twitter misinformation tag coming, tweets like Dr Hooman’s, which aren’t based on any evidence, but spread fear, will be labeled as such. Baby steps.
2 replies 4 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @gorskon
The most shocking and terrifying aspect of information exchange in this day and age is arrogant MDs and PhDs who want to censor and quash ANY concerns about consumer and patient safety. THAT, is the terrifying dimension of the sick psychology you folks are promoting. Truly sick!
8 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon
Dr. Hooman. That which has been asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You have provided no evidence for your claim. We have provided evidence that it is incorrect. No amount of name-calling from your side changes those facts, I’m afraid.
4 replies 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @gorskon
Before the 2 Boeing 737MAXX aircrafts crashed, there was no evidence of the prognosticated design flaw at Boeing. The kind of evidence you are asking for will come when the harm is a fait accompli....We CAN be intelligent, thoughtful, decent and efficient. Try it!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @AlastairMcA30
Actually, that is most definitely not true. There were warning signs. They were ignored.https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/long-before-first-737-max-crash-boeing-knew-a-key-sensor-warning-light-wasnt-working-but-told-no-one/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
Seriously, Dr. N, that's a horrible example. There were warning signs, and Boeing didn't report them to the FAA. You do not know what you are talking about.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-18/boeing-directors-sued-over-missed-warning-signs-on-737-max-8 …
-
-
How can a MD/PhD like “Dr.” N be so consistently wrong on a science thread?
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.