That's a nonanswer, unresponsive; so I'll repeat my question and keep repeating it until you give a responsive answer or walk away.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Here's my question again: Explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is different from what antivaxxers do when it comes to anecdotes of death or adverse events after any vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
How is what U R doing any different from what compromised industry protectionists do? Again, we are talking about a serious safety signal and U are trying to apply your outdated "vaccine narrative" tools of war. I'm not fighting U. I am pointing out a specific danger to
@US_FDA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
A rather transparent attempt at distraction and not answering. So here's my question again: Explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
He tagged us both on the latest deaths with a question he clearly thought was a “gotcha.” If he’s not fighting you, he’s doing it wrong.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
I think u folks should take the safety concern with indiscriminate vaccination of the infected in the midst of a pandemic very seriously. Drop your egos and Ur stale narrative beating up on the like of RFK….as u can see none of them are running to my side. Grow up!
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
You continue to dodge my question. Please explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
I am searching for evidence based on unassailable immunological principle that indiscriminately immunizing the infected is a danger. This is NOT the same as the “vaccines cause autism” hogwash. Immunology is a science - & U are stuck in Ur stale OLD narrative.
@US_FDA aware.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Again, your searching for evidence involves using deaths the same way antivaxxers do. Please explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Grow up! Brain on! You undermine a serious and clear safety concern. U R a danger to public health because U undermine an avoidable safety concern. U shld be on the side of safely. It’s shameful. Truly. Brain on!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Unresponsive. Again. Please explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after #COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.
-
-
Because the clinical trial did not included Elderly and frail subjects with cv disease and recent infections. So we are left with looking for signals retrospectively…. I agree. Not the ideal way. But at present without
@US_FDA@DrWoodcockFDA intervention….the only way.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Searching social media and news reports for anecdotes is NOT "looking for a signal." It's doing what antivaxxers do, looking for stories that they can use to blame vaccines for bad things.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.