Yup. We’ve long been warning about what I like to call the weaponization by antivaxxers of a veritable tsunami of claims of adverse events and deaths after vaccination that occur by random chance alone, ask too spread fear of #COVIDVaccine.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
Ur contention that immunological complications resulting from indiscriminate vaccination of the infected in the midst of a pandemic outbreak R "random" is fully unscientific, dismissive and irresponsible. Indiscriminate vaccination of the infected likely poses a danger.
@US_FDA3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
You clearly don’t understand my point. Put aside your idée fixe for a moment and consider adverse events that have nothing to do with your pet hypothesis, like what I discussed here.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/syncope-and-bells-palsy-telling-correlation-from-causation-for-adverse-events-observed-after-covid-19-vaccination/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Then consider these additional examples.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/syncope-and-bells-palsy-telling-correlation-from-causation-for-adverse-events-observed-after-covid-19-vaccination/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Then consider how antivaxxers have misused the VAERS database to falsely attribute causation to correlation.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-as-dangerous-continue-apace-vaers-edition/ …
2 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Basically, you are doing the same thing as antivaxxers here. We’ve tried to explain this to you many times, but you don’t listen.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
I listen very carefully. I don't think you are correct. We should all be very concerned about ANY death that occur post-vaccination after this roll-out in case they are part of a safety signal. U just wanna assume there is no safety signal - where there is reason to be vigilant.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
OK, I'll bite. Explain why I'm not correct. Explain HOW what you are doing is different from what antivaxxers do when it comes to anecdotes of death or adverse events after vaccination.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
U r not correct in your assumption that FDA/CDC would automatically look to see if Post-vaccine COVID-19 death or thromboembolic events are triggered by the vaccine. Post-vaccine COVID-19 dz/death and thrombomebolic events are not in the "Vaccine-related" denominator.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
That's a nonanswer, unresponsive; so I'll repeat my question and keep repeating it until you give a responsive answer or walk away.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
Here's my question again: Explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after #COVIDVaccine is different from what antivaxxers do when it comes to anecdotes of death or adverse events after any vaccination.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
How is what U R doing any different from what compromised industry protectionists do? Again, we are talking about a serious safety signal and U are trying to apply your outdated "vaccine narrative" tools of war. I'm not fighting U. I am pointing out a specific danger to
@US_FDA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
A rather transparent attempt at distraction and not answering. So here's my question again: Explain HOW what you are doing with anecdotes of death after
#COVIDVaccine is ANY different from what antivaxxers do with anecdotes of death and adverse events after ANY vaccination.1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.