That's not all, though. Like antivaxxers, you attack your critics as arrogant close-minded zealots who can't even consider the possibility that you might be right and #CovidVaccine might be dangerous in the previously infected.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Like antivaxxers, you have insinuated that provaccine advocates are basically fascists who want to round up antivaxxers and the vaccine hesitant and forcibly vaccinate them.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Like antivaxxers, you have invoked the "too many too soon" trope (a trope for which there was no evidence) in which you suggested that too many vaccines at a young age can cause inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Like antivaxxers, you have accused pro-vaccine advocates who criticize you of being "unconcerned" about vaccine safety—and unfairly and inaccurately, too.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
I'll conclude by saying that I *really* want to believe you when you say you're not antivaccine but rather very provaccine. However, you're making it difficult, because you're behaving in a disturbingly similar way to how I've seen antivaxxers behave for the last two decades.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @LouKellett and
There you go with your binary physics again....You sound like George W Bush: U're either with us or U're against us. Give it break good man. There is such a thing as balanced thinking and risk management.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @LouKellett and
Seriously, you're destroying another irony meter describing me that way. Your thinking is about as binary as it gets, and you are utterly immune to disconfirming studies, information, or reason on this matter.pic.twitter.com/WGmhS7udJG
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @LouKellett and
No David. I acknowledge all the likely benefits and efficacy of these vaccines and recommend that all get vaccinated ASAP. But I am actively thinking using basic science to prognosticate and look for safety signals. U don't seem to believe in need for looking - despite dangers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @LouKellett and
You do love your straw men arguments, don't you? I never said any such thing. What I did say is that your "prognostication" lacks basic science plausibility and we have not found any safety signals predicted by it after 30 million doses of
#CovidVaccine.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @LouKellett and
Your thought that this prognostication lacks "basic scientific plausibility" is simply wrong and disingenuous Professor. U ought to study some of the basic cellular immunology work started in the early 90s by Professor Oldstone, of The Scripps Institute.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Actually, that's not the right place to look. There's much more recent science published on a preprint server in December that was admittedly the best evidence I could find for your hypothesis. Let's put it this way. It wasn't that great.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.