You've been informed of the techniques and tropes that antivaxxers use to spread their narrative and how you were using the same sorts of techniques and tropes, but you continue to use them.
You do love your straw men arguments, don't you? I never said any such thing. What I did say is that your "prognostication" lacks basic science plausibility and we have not found any safety signals predicted by it after 30 million doses of #CovidVaccine.
-
-
I've also noted that
#COVIDVaccine is under an unprecedented program of pharmacovigilance, which should, again after 30 million doses, be able to detect even weak safety signals.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your thought that this prognostication lacks "basic scientific plausibility" is simply wrong and disingenuous Professor. U ought to study some of the basic cellular immunology work started in the early 90s by Professor Oldstone, of The Scripps Institute.
-
Actually, that's not the right place to look. There's much more recent science published on a preprint server in December that was admittedly the best evidence I could find for your hypothesis. Let's put it this way. It wasn't that great.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.