Except that Dr. N is doing way more than that. He’s looking for anecdotes in news reports and social media of people who died after #CovidVaccine and then pointing to them as support his implausible hypothesis. I keep telling him this is what antivaxxers have traditionally done. https://twitter.com/noorchashm/status/1359098069804068868 …
-
-
Dr. G. The half of folks who are going to get the vaccine will, irrespective. But the other half are FAR more likely to trust me than they are to trust U. Because U only work to undermine safety concerns. That's incorrect behavior. Yes, it's very easy to be a mainstream bully.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please read. You might agree. Though I suspect your attacks are only binary.
@DrWoodcockFDA@CDCDirector@US_FDA@pfizer@AlbertBourla@nytDeniseGrady@GerriShaftel@jon_kamp@kwstarkhttps://noorchashm.medium.com/vaccinating-the-covid-19-infected-a-dangerous-clinical-and-regulatory-misstep-for-the-elderly-and-5c445df9084f …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As any first year law student would tell U, "what is correlated could be caused" - esp. in the presence of a solid basic scientific prognostication. Therefore, because of the sheer magnitude of the problem we face, the ethical position is 2 look carefully and to mitigate.
-
As any epidemiologist would tell you, first you actually have to show correlation, and anecdotes don't even count for that. That epidemiologist would then tell you that most correlations turn out not to indicate causation.

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.