It is quite possible to "listen" without reinforcing the assumption of causation that has not been demonstrated and using people's tragedies to support your pet idea.
-
-
I'll conclude by saying that I *really* want to believe you when you say you're not antivaccine but rather very provaccine. However, you're making it difficult, because you're behaving in a disturbingly similar way to how I've seen antivaxxers behave for the last two decades.
-
There you go with your binary physics again....You sound like George W Bush: U're either with us or U're against us. Give it break good man. There is such a thing as balanced thinking and risk management.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
U are pretty darned unconcerned about vaccinating people who are already infected with SARS-CoV-2, because it is your prejudice that they are not at risk. Ur prejudice goes in the face of immunological basic science and SOC in medicine. We do NOT immunize the actively infected.
-
You are pretty all fired concerned about vaccinating those already infected because it is your prejudice that they ARE at horrible risk. (See how that works?) And, no, it does NOT go against the standard of care, as we've explained to you many times.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.