Seeking out anecdotes and trying to fit them into your pet theory about vaccines is something anti-vaccine activists do when, for example, they go after SIDS parents and ask if their child was vaccinated before deaths. It's problematic, and not a way to find evidence. https://twitter.com/noorchashm/status/1358832190486904838 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @doritmi
Not quite D. In the face of rapidly deployed public health efforts that R new and in new environments (I.e., a pandemic) the signal detection threshold for scientifically cogent hazards shld B tweaked way down. Bc safety problems can’t be missed. I know
@DrWoodcockFDA agrees.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @DrWoodcockFDA
Extensive efforts are put into safety of these vaccines. Tracking down people who lost loved ones to use them to favor a pet theory doesn’t help safety.
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @DrWoodcockFDA
The subset analysis in the infected and especially those who are elderly and frail w cv disease was simply not done.
@pfizer@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA@CDCDirector are aware of this safety deficit in the trials. Look for yourself. The eyes do not see what the mind does not know.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @DrWoodcockFDA and
You can try to convince FDA to do a sub analysis without tracking down bereaved individuals and trying to use them to promote your pet hypothesis.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Precisely!pic.twitter.com/xiDgg14L3w
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.