How’d you fairly categorise yourself as an immunologist, Dr. N? Yes, you have coauthored a few dated publications in the transplantation area, etc but nothing in the ID field. You, sir, perhaps have dabbled in immunology but I don’t see evidence of an ‘immunologist’.
-
-
Replying to @deralteGaukler @gorskon and
ID and Immunology are two distinct fields. Related but distinct. U R correct I am not an Infectious disease specialist. But I have done extensive work in cellular immunology and hold a PhD in that field from the University of Pennsylvania. Stop the mindlessness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
Whether your preference to self-qualify yourself as an immunologist based on past ID-unrelated work is justified or not is moot. What's mindless, as has been pointed out, how you've chosen to communicated your unsubstantiated opinion in public given rising vax hesitancy.
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @deralteGaukler @gorskon and
Negative. Risk mitigation is essential in large scale public health efforts. Check yourself! What are your qualification? Are you a physician or an immunologist?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @deralteGaukler and
I think if you had said “I have a concern that the vaccine may cause thrombosis in previously infected people and it should be studied” then no one would object.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @deralteGaukler and
I have a concern that the vaccine may cause thrombosis in previously infected people and it should be studied. And while it’s being studied, since we’ll B immunizing 200m in 6mos, we should
#ScreenB4Vaccine to avoid vaccine in the infected.@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @deralteGaukler and
Ok. Leave it at that. You’ve gone a step beyond that saying it is dangerous in that population without evidence and discouraging people from getting the vaccine.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JaiKanta22 @JHowardBrainMD and
Yup, and he made his speculation sound a lot more certain than it was by repeatedly calling it definitive “immunological prognostication.”
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JaiKanta22 and
Yes. It is a “definitive immunological prognostication”.....if you activate a T cell response to antigens that are present in the tissues of a person, those tissues will be targeted and damaged by the immune system. Please read Michael Oldstone’s work from The Scripps.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Even if that’s true, the evidence that there is #COVID19 protein being expressed in the vascular endothelium is not convincing at all. Indeed, there is good evidence that it is not, as @ENirenberg and I discussed—evidence you have never addressed.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/02/05/dr-hooman-noorchashm-and-screenb4vaccine-revisited/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.