I have to say thang whether that is a plausible thing to look at is outside my lane, and I’m going to leave it to you experts. Dr. N is welcome to try and convince the experts to do that sub analysis.
-
-
Honestly, it seems to have *enough* plausibility that I'd like to see someone convince the experts to do that sub-analysis. Someone other than Dr.N, preferably, who can make it seem like a reasonable concern and not an idee fixe.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JDCBurnhil @doritmi and
Go for it Professors Gorski and Reiss....Call on
@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA@Pfizer to do the subset analysis with urgency. Your ad hominem attacks on my position have been unwarranted. The vaccine is critical to public health - but that doesn't obviate the need for risk mitigation.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @JDCBurnhil and
“Hey, you pro lifers, morons, people who don’t care about safety, let’s unite!” Sorry, doesn’t work. You gave us no reason to trust your judgment, and Dr. Gorskon pointed to why your view is problematic. And claiming ad hominem attacks at this point is.... strange.
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @JDCBurnhil and
I think what is problematic is our contemporary American incapacity to be balanced. Efficacy and safety must be balanced well - especially in emergencies. Consider this: fast forward and my concern is material. Do you know how much credibility U'd lose? Reason shld prevail!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JDCBurnhil and
The point is that the claim that safety isn’t taken seriously is simply untrue. And when you say this, you are less, not more, plausible. And anyone looking at ACIP meetings discussing the data would see it. Safety data is carefully examined. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @noorchashm and
You are trying to claim there is a specific risk and calling for a specific sub-analysis. You can try to convince FDA & CDC. Dr. Gorski explains why he isn’t convinced, and I agree. And calling on people you’re attacking to promote your idea they disagree with doesn’t work. 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @JDCBurnhil and
Reason fails....As it does with pro-lifers. Reason fails, despite your MDs and JDs. smh.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JDCBurnhil and
And this is why asking us to unite, after you’ve been doing this kind of attack for a while, is a bit jarring.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @noorchashm and
“Unite with me you fools and morons.”
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
You beat me too it, except that I'd have phrased it thusly, "Unite with me, you fools who are moronically unconcerned about vaccine safety, to pressure @US_FDA to address my vaccine safety concern!" That about sums up his Twitter feed over the last week.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @JHowardBrainMD and
Except, David, I'm asking you to unite with me - oh MDs and JDs of reason and integrity. Ha!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.