Honestly, it seems to have *enough* plausibility that I'd like to see someone convince the experts to do that sub-analysis. Someone other than Dr.N, preferably, who can make it seem like a reasonable concern and not an idee fixe.
-
-
Replying to @JDCBurnhil @doritmi and
Go for it Professors Gorski and Reiss....Call on
@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA@Pfizer to do the subset analysis with urgency. Your ad hominem attacks on my position have been unwarranted. The vaccine is critical to public health - but that doesn't obviate the need for risk mitigation.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @JDCBurnhil and
“Hey, you pro lifers, morons, people who don’t care about safety, let’s unite!” Sorry, doesn’t work. You gave us no reason to trust your judgment, and Dr. Gorskon pointed to why your view is problematic. And claiming ad hominem attacks at this point is.... strange.
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @JDCBurnhil and
I think what is problematic is our contemporary American incapacity to be balanced. Efficacy and safety must be balanced well - especially in emergencies. Consider this: fast forward and my concern is material. Do you know how much credibility U'd lose? Reason shld prevail!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Wr know there will be an unending parade of demands for safety. You are concerned about DVTs. Soon we will hear concerns about MS, strokes, pancreatic cancer, lupus.... it will never end. burden of proof shifts on to you to show danger is real, not us to show it is false.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @doritmi and
Certainly strokes fall under the category of thromboembolic events.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @noorchashm and
Can you prove to me atenolol doesn’t cause lymphocytic histiocytosis? Has this ever been investigated? Is safety monitoring even being done for this? Wouldn’t you want to reassure people who are worried about this risk?
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @noorchashm @JHowardBrainMD and
People can understand and also disagree with your view.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Indeed. It is truly the mark of arrogance to assume that anyone who doesn't agree with you does so because they don't understand your claim or the basis for it.
-
-
I'm ok with disagreement. Disagree away - at risk to own cred later. But your disagreement does not lessen the gravity of the science of immunology - nor
@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA@pfizer@moderna_tx 's ethical and legal duty to adjudicate if the risk is material.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.