Effects over the next 3 to 5 years polio had cancer based on contamination, death rates of MMR in Africa are higher for vaccine than nit vaccinated kids all vaccines stopped for MMR in Africa ... I am pro vaccine, and love them but there is a long history
-
-
Replying to @jagmistereus @JHowardBrainMD and
Saying you’re provaccine while promoting this kind of misinformation aimed to scare people off vaccines is unconvincing.
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @jagmistereus and
Actually Dorit, blowing off and undermining people’s safety concerns does far more to erode trust and cause hesitancy. When we empathically stfu and listen to people’s concerns - then we begin to solve problems. The lack of humility in the arguments u represent are astonishing!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @jagmistereus and
I and others have been responding to antivaccine misinformation for years. You seem to be arguing that in an online discussion (not a personal interview) we should keep quiet and not correct misinformation about vaccines. The problem is that that can mislead people.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @jagmistereus and
I think u folks R misleading and intellectually quite lazy. Yes. It’s a very simple task to adhere to utilitarian arguments without due consideration to the why and whether of hesitancy and safety, respectively. The positions U take are quite superficial and wo nuance. Change.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Pot. Kettle. Black. It is in fact YOUR arguments that are quite superficial and lack nuance. You don’t understand the difference between vaccine-hesitant and antivaccine. You can’t counter the studies I cite that suggest the premise of
#ScreenB4Vaccine has low plausibility.1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
You ignore the evidence of tens of millions of doses of
#CovidVaccine administered without a safety signal predicted by your hypothesis. Instead, you keep robotically repeating#ScreenB4Vaccine and how that’s based on your “immunological prognostication.”2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
David, again. If COVID-19 disease/death and thromboembolic events days after vaccination are not classified as “vaccine related”, a signal won’t be “seen”. If U do not look, U do not see. What of that don’t u get? Believe me, I’d love to C my prognostication not bear out.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @doritmi and
Baseline rates, man. If such events occur in the vaccinated at a detectably higher rate than the expected baseline rate, then THAT’S a safety signal, regardless of how the deaths are ruled. After tens of millions of doses, they haven’t. Do you not understand basic epidemiology?
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
There is much more to baseline rates observation and effect is not a simple correlation but conceptually you are correct
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I know, but I was keeping it simple for Dr. N.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @jagmistereus and
David. I’m sure the data is there by now. Millions have been vaccinated. Now
@DrWoodcockFDA@US_FDA@CDCDirector@pfizer need to do subset analyses looking directly at rates of COVID disease/death and thromboembolic events post vaccine. I’d
nothing more than to B wrong here.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.