-Rocky development: no, was very smooth -“Various issues reported”: name them please, I’m unaware -Other vaccines: not applicable by your own callout of this platform -Anaphylaxis: all cases resolved with treatment There are no absolutes but there is nothing concerning here.
-
-
Replying to @notdred @JHowardBrainMD and
The history is there I am all for vaccines but I am not for someone like you that does not do research acting like an expert and saying everything is as safe as water no worries ... and
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jagmistereus @notdred and
I don't know of anyone saying "safe as water". The standard "safer than COVID-19" is certainly being met, though, and tends to be the one guiding our decisions.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @JDCBurnhil @notdred and
Safer then the serious adverse events associated with covid 19 agreed , but long term toxity if this platform is unknown it is being presumed as negligible but it is unknown right now
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @JDCBurnhil and
Effects over the next 3 to 5 years polio had cancer based on contamination, death rates of MMR in Africa are higher for vaccine than nit vaccinated kids all vaccines stopped for MMR in Africa ... I am pro vaccine, and love them but there is a long history
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jagmistereus @JHowardBrainMD and
Saying you’re provaccine while promoting this kind of misinformation aimed to scare people off vaccines is unconvincing.
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @jagmistereus and
Actually Dorit, blowing off and undermining people’s safety concerns does far more to erode trust and cause hesitancy. When we empathically stfu and listen to people’s concerns - then we begin to solve problems. The lack of humility in the arguments u represent are astonishing!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @jagmistereus and
I and others have been responding to antivaccine misinformation for years. You seem to be arguing that in an online discussion (not a personal interview) we should keep quiet and not correct misinformation about vaccines. The problem is that that can mislead people.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @jagmistereus and
I think u folks R misleading and intellectually quite lazy. Yes. It’s a very simple task to adhere to utilitarian arguments without due consideration to the why and whether of hesitancy and safety, respectively. The positions U take are quite superficial and wo nuance. Change.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Pot. Kettle. Black. It is in fact YOUR arguments that are quite superficial and lack nuance. You don’t understand the difference between vaccine-hesitant and antivaccine. You can’t counter the studies I cite that suggest the premise of #ScreenB4Vaccine has low plausibility.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
You ignore the evidence of tens of millions of doses of
#CovidVaccine administered without a safety signal predicted by your hypothesis. Instead, you keep robotically repeating#ScreenB4Vaccine and how that’s based on your “immunological prognostication.”2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Meanwhile, you dismiss your critics as the “peanut gallery,” unconcerned about vaccine safety, blind zealots, even fascists who want to round up the vaccine hesitant and put them in internment camps. No, your arguments have been ANYTHING but “nuanced.”
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.