Also, I've been fighting quackery for two decades and the antivax movement almost as long.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @JDCBurnhil and
In a liberal democracy, taking the utilitarian position while ignoring or downplaying potential or real risks of harm is intellectually lazy and ethically lax. Being "PRO-vax" is like stating the sky is up. Of course it is. The trick is can U see and prevent the safety cracks?
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HawkguyClint @gorskon and
A vaccine is a utilitarian product. It is designed for majority benefit. It's an English word. Please look it up.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HawkguyClint @noorchashm and
Scientists dabbling in philosophy almost always embarrass themselves.
3 replies 3 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @HawkguyClint and
"Scientists" with no understanding of Philosophy and ethics are no scientists.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @HawkguyClint and
Then you are no scientist, because your understanding of philosophy and ethics is clearly...wanting.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @HawkguyClint and
sigh. David. Sigh. I feel like I'm dealign with one of my school-children, and not a professor of surgery. smh!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
In fairness, he was one, although according to this not since 2015. https://www.ctsnet.org/home/hnoorchashm …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.