Here's something I wrote three years before the pandemic discussing this very issue...https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/donald-trump-versus-the-fda-part-2/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nate thinks he is an expert on everything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why didn't the FDA do a rolling review? Doesn't the EMA do that?
-
There was a thought that the FDA would approve the vaccine for those most at risk just based on interim analyses, but the convalescent plasma debacle put an end to that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They have no responsibility or accountability or power. If people die, not their fault. So from that position, sure, wave it through.
-
Exactly this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No one has ever considered this before. Ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've found that many people who work in the statistician/data scientist/programmer arena are like engineers, they mistake math for science and don't acknowledge how biased data can be. Data is not neutral and can be the realm of people overly convinced of their own objectivity.
-
Oh, definitely. Ditto scientists in the physical sciences, like physics, chemistry, etc. They don't understand the complexities and biases baked into epidemiological and clinical trial data and think that analyzing such data requires just a good knowledge of statistics.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I appreciate your responses for their content, but I don’t understand why Nate seems to get under your skin. Why not simply reply with the substance and skip the passive-aggressiveness (I’ve seen this in several of your responses).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.