Caveat that underscores ur point tho: are older folk less likely to have been unknowingly infected (more careful eg) than younger ppl? Probably. So yeah- it is a complicated Q to answer
-
-
Replying to @BurgerLab12 @JaiKanta22 and
Not complicate at all. If elderly frail and with cv disease,
#ScreenB4Vaccine. Because, vaccinating infected people is a breach of standard medical care. PERIOD!4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JaiKanta22 and
Ok- I’m not a clinician and that’s not what I’m asking . I’m asking if there is any data that you’re tracking that might give some indication about the predictions that your hypothesis implies. I think that’s fair, no?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @BurgerLab12 @JaiKanta22 and
Very fair. Unfortunately the way fda and cdc are collecting data is confounding. Post vaccine COVID disease/death is not registered as “vaccine related”. Problem is: the vaccine may trigger COVID inflammation in the recently infected. C? We do not c what we do not look 4.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @BurgerLab12 and
According to this article - which I'm not saying is right, I simply don't know - the VAERS data has serious limitations and the Vaccine Safety Datalink and V-Safe Database data are not being made public. Is that correct?https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/did-cdc-mislead-public-allergic-reactions-moderna-vaccine/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AJonSchultz @noorchashm and
You’re citing the antivax liar RFK Jr.? Seriously? Actually, it’s even worse than that. John Stone is just utterly bonkers even by antivax standards.


1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AJonSchultz and
As for VAERS, misrepresenting it is a longstanding antivax tactic.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-as-dangerous-continue-apace-vaers-edition/ …
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AJonSchultz and
Others have written about this too.https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/an-overview-of-us-vaccine-pharmacovigilance …
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
Thanks for the links, which I'll read, but I think you engage in too much ad hominem argumentation, criticizing ppl instead of what's being said (when ppl don't know if your criticism of the ppl is valid). Is there a valid reason why the other two databases are secret?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AJonSchultz @gorskon and
VSD uses actual patients records from HMOs. There are privacy concerns.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
Yup, and 16 years ago antivaxxers Mark and David Geier got access to VSD. They were busted for going beyond their protocol and trying to combine parts of the database to identify individuals.
-
-
Here’s the warning letter... https://www.aapsonline.org/vaccines/geierirb.pdf …
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.