Ok. Here.
@RobertKennedyJr I respectfully request that u not use my safety warning to @DrWoodcockFDA to drive an anti-vaccine agenda.
My warning is ONLY about vaccinating the convalescent and infected elderly and frail with CV disease.
#COVIDVaccineIsPatriotic
B a patriot.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JaiKanta22 @noorchashm and
I agree with your assessment, but I'm still quite glad that Dr. Hooman took a stand against RFK Jr.'s chronic and expected misrepresentations.
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @JDCBurnhil @JaiKanta22 and
Oh, I'm glad he did, too. Finally. It took a LOT of prodding, though, and not just by me.
2 replies 1 retweet 40 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JDCBurnhil and
I can't judge the science but take Dr. Hooman's side because he is much more respectful than you, Dr. Gorski. Name callers tend to bend facts to prove they are right. Mr. Kennedy is also much more respectful and a true freedom fighter, imo, even if his science is somewhat flawed.
21 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AJonSchultz @gorskon and
JDC Burnhil Retweeted JDC Burnhil
"tend to bend facts to prove they are right"??? You're delivering that line in a conversation referencing RFK Jr. but not saying a word about HIS long history of totally FALSIFYING???https://twitter.com/JDCBurnhil/status/1344444179758379013?s=19 …
JDC Burnhil added,
2 replies 2 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @JDCBurnhil @AJonSchultz and
Assassinating the character of a person for political purposes has nothing to do with the pandemic. PRO this, ANTI that. Give a break good man. We are running out of time to control this pandemic. Divided and clueless about all the risks, we fall. It’s not about RFK.
14 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @JDCBurnhil and
And here you had me wondering if I'd gone too far in asking if you were a "useful idiot" for antivaxxers movement. I'd even started to feel bad, as if I had gone too far. No longer, I'm afraid. Your continued portrayal of criticism of RFK Jr. as "character assassination" did it.
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @noorchashm and
I wonder how Dr. Noorchashm would handle it if he were in your situation, having responded to and debunked RFK jr.’s misrepresentations for over 15 years. I suspect, given his behavior here, he would be a lot less matter of fact and analytic than you are on new articles.
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
I would welcome a public debate with Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Gorski. When shall we do it? Divided we fall. Together we can solve problems. There are many whose ears RFK has. Are you certain he is not amenable to reason? He is a pretty well trained attorney - and has done some good.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Pro-science advocates should not do "public debates" with antiscience cranks like RFK Jr. Such fake "debates" value rhetoric over substance and fact, which is why antiscience cranks love them so much and why I will never do one with RFK Jr.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2013/04/26/all-truth-comes-from-public-debate-a-corollary-to-crank-magnetism/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.