It is not a rhetorical argument. It is a risk prognostication based on the science of immunology in an uncertain and unprecedented new terrain. U folks are kinda surreal. Almost like the trump people. Wow!
-
-
Replying to @noorchashm @Rosewind2007 and
There are uncertainties and your hypothesis is not beyond the realm of possibilities. It is just that it is unlikely given the data against. And when I say unlikely, I am using a scientific not practical definition. I’d say we are about as close to zero science can get.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dwramzimdmph @noorchashm and
And what I am asking, and failing to get an actual answer to, is why link to an example of where a man with a prior infection tragically died BUT where the vaccine was RULED out as a contributing factor. It seems counterintuitive to do so; unless you are trying to mislead.
3 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @dwramzimdmph and
That is exactly what he is doing. And badly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KrochetxKorner @Rosewind2007 and
Please read with care, if you care to. My position is not political:https://noorchashm.medium.com/the-clear-cut-ethics-of-covid-19-vaccination-a-patriotic-duty-with-safety-in-mind-e678935a1334 …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @noorchashm @Rosewind2007 and
No one is talking politics here. It is just weird you're talking about vaccines causing death, then link an article that DISPROVES your point. Do you not find that absurd?
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @KrochetxKorner @noorchashm and
I have to say that the idea that two Brits are trying make this conversation about vaccine safety into one about US politics is...downright weird!
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @noorchashm and
It is, and trying to compare us to trumpanzees, is bizarre. I think he is trying to gain some sort of hold in the vaccine stance and seeing what will make him most popular. For an MD he sure isn't helping public safety.
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @KrochetxKorner @Rosewind2007 and
Indeed. His comparing me (and others who have questioned his suggested plan) to Trump cultists was offensive in the extreme and leads me to question his exhortations of "Always polite." Apparently that applies only to us and not to him.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @KrochetxKorner and
Anyone who does not listen to pure reason IS the trumpkins and the pro-lifers. The vaccine narrative in kids is not applicable to the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine. Stay in that echo chamber and u’ll miss emerging catastrophe. We are stronger together. Don’t ignore and mock.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And anyone who shrugs his shoulders and does nothing about an antivax leader using his letter and publication to spread antivax propaganda is... well, you know what I think he is, and it’s abbreviated UI.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @KrochetxKorner and
I got it. U hate
@RobertKennedyJr ... I frankly don’t know him well enough and don’t hate anyone..... In fact I hold his father in great esteem.... Anyway, I’m not interested in politics....interested in maximizing trust through safety.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @gorskon and
Then you are failing when you associate yourself and become a mouth piece for a notorious antivaxxer. His father was a good man, and so are Jr's siblings, but he is not. Do you not care for the outright lies he spreads about vaccines? Since you say you care about trust and safety
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.