It is not a rhetorical argument. It is a risk prognostication based on the science of immunology in an uncertain and unprecedented new terrain. U folks are kinda surreal. Almost like the trump people. Wow!
-
-
Replying to @noorchashm @Rosewind2007 and
There are uncertainties and your hypothesis is not beyond the realm of possibilities. It is just that it is unlikely given the data against. And when I say unlikely, I am using a scientific not practical definition. I’d say we are about as close to zero science can get.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dwramzimdmph @noorchashm and
And what I am asking, and failing to get an actual answer to, is why link to an example of where a man with a prior infection tragically died BUT where the vaccine was RULED out as a contributing factor. It seems counterintuitive to do so; unless you are trying to mislead.
3 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @dwramzimdmph and
By the time the evidence is gathered, at the rate we are vaccinating the population, it will be too late to mitigate. What don't you understand about that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @dwramzimdmph and
Then WHY link to a story about a death which utterly fails to support your theory? And then claim it actually does. Despite your claim be directly contradicted by the article.pic.twitter.com/IYGIZ5EKsD
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @dwramzimdmph and
"The eyes do not see what the mind does not know." U r neither a physician, nor an immunologist. U R only following a rote party line. To be clear I 100% agree with
@JoeBiden's plan to vaccinate 150Million Americans in 100 days! But safely, with adequate warning from FDA.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @dwramzimdmph and
I am most certainly not a physician nor an immunologist, and neither do I claim to be. I have no party line. I am, for a start, in the UK so unlikely to actually be interested in you tagging in your president (what a daft thing to do). I can see that you’re being disingenuous.pic.twitter.com/8jQgfLUOrt
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @noorchashm and
You’re linking to the death of a man, a death which the article YOU link to says was not caused by the vaccine. YOUR article states the vaccine was RULED OUT. You tag in a prominent anti-vaxxer in your post. You hashtag the dead man. Yes: I have eyes, and I can see you.pic.twitter.com/lxCeaz8SMK
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Rosewind2007 @dwramzimdmph and
I tagged a prominent pro-vaxxer too and the press and the FDA commissioner. What's your point? smh!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @noorchashm @dwramzimdmph and
Why tag an anti-vaxxer AT ALL? WHY? Why tag in a dangerous crank who puts people’s lives at risk daily? Someone whose actions have doubtlessly caused deaths from a preventable disease? Why tag in such a person at all?
1 reply 2 retweets 21 likes
That is an excellent question.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.