And here’s that same antivax trope again...https://twitter.com/becciav1983/status/1354711661429608448 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Listening to ACIP or reading the many legitimate articles on safety or effectiveness issues would show that very incorrect. It’s just that the issues show the risk benefit balance clearly supports vaccines, even if they’re imperfect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*merely* .. probably wasn't a question at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frankly, it's not much different from people talking about "questioning historical orthodoxy". They ask questions, they aren't happy with the answers.
-
That sounds like the sort of thing Holocaust deniers do...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ah the JAQoffs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also let's not pretend that 99% of the time, those questions are not dumb af
-
Oh, they are. They very frequently are. But, again, it’s not dumb questions that are the problem. It’s the refusal to accept good answers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Case in point ^. If it’s not antivax, it’s conspiracy or any other label. Labels diminish the ability to have rational and open debate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
