Not problematic or annoying. Provocative, in a good way. Like science is supposed to be.
-
-
Your “oeuvre” re science based medicine is really compelling. Vinay’s “oeuvre” is too. No need to convince or prove that one argument negates the other. Non-resolution of debate is frustrating but perhaps inevitable. A feature not a bug of Twitter.

-
But that’s my point! I don’t try to negate Vinay’s oeuvre or otherwise try to denigrate it. (Read
@stevennovella and my posts again if you don’t believe me.) I never have. The same can’t be said of Vinay about MY oeuvre. Whenever he addresses it at all it’s just to shit on it. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.