I predict that his cited examples will be hilariously off-base; that is, if he can cite any at all.https://twitter.com/matt_microglia/status/1353714124228710401 …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
Hilariously, I predict you won’t accept my examples with that attitude. But the most egregious is your mischaracterization (conspiracy theory in its own way as you offered no supporting science) of the focused protection plan by GBD as eugenics-adjacent or some such nonsense.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matt_microglia
Given how
@aier set the whole#GreatBarringtonDeclaration up, I stand by my characterization. I can also easily find examples of GBD advocates invoking the same sorts of conspiracy theories about#COVID19 as COVID deniers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well that’s a false equivalency. The ideas of the GBD can be correct AND there can be GBD advocates who are wrong about other things. Just like there can be licensed MD physicians peddling nonsense about vaccines, as I know of which you are aware.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You really aren't helping your argument. The point is that #GreatBarringtonDeclaration originated with @aier, a right wing "think tank" that's been pushing #COVID19 conspiracy theories all along. It's just an extension of those conspiracy theories given a patina of respectability
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.