It's disappointing to see people retweeting comments about our article in Scientific American as if it vindicates their side of the debate over lockdowns. Both sides are guilty of shouting and lack of nuance. See the historic example of this folly:https://bit.ly/3qp1dl3
-
-
What’s sad is that JI and his ilk massively inhibited an honest discussion of trade-offs. He led people to falsely believe we had to chose between lockdowns and flu-level deaths. He and his defenders are covid-denial light, which is more dangerous than the obviously looms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.