Correct. They were quacks. My part time job was explaining to people why hcq did not work for covid. I am seeing something very different in the ivermectin data. Not calling it a cure or a miracle. The data emerging seem to be lining up reproducibly, and deserves a good look.
-
-
I wonder how many people will try it and discover they had intestinal parasites
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Déjà-moo: the uncanny feeling that you've heard this bull before.
-
How about déjà woo?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interestingly,
#Ivermectin fans are now citing a dodgy "meta-analysis" video done by someone who's a consultant for@WHO and@UNITAID and representing it as the WHO endorsing Ivermectin as "transformational" for#COVID19. Uh, no. That's just his opinion, not that of the WHO.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously, when I see ivermectin being discarded by the same people who didn't see
#lancetgate was a fraud, using the same bad arguments which make us suspect that they don't event read the studies...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
A medicine widely available for about $1/dose, with virtually no side effects, showing promise in all phases of the disease by multiple trials but with possibly biased data, is being recommended for early treatment by a group of highly qualified ICU doctors and you object to... ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.