I know a fair bit about COVID. I spent a fairly large part of my life reading research about COVID. And I'm a good reader—it's part of my job. I'm not doing any epidemiology on my own. The problem is that ACIP's recommendations on vaccine prioritization don't match the research.https://twitter.com/mikeandallie/status/1340474677081366528 …
-
-
I still wonder how
@NateSilver538 spent a large part of his life researching something that’s been around less than a year. -
Was just wondering the same thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're gonna have to get used to being questioned Dave
-
He’s not being “questioned,” gormless.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not really. There’s highly questionable ‘ethics’ at the root of the schedule. Ethics are not science nor can epidemiology claim to be experts in ethics.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You offer no actual rebuttal and also ACIP recommendation was updated today to almost exactly what Silver was saying. Maybe an almighty PHD like you should’ve read the data yourself instead of getting your panties in a wad that someone might dare disagree
-
There is no need for a rebuttal, Nate is flawed from his initial premise. He has shown he doesn’t even have basic reading comprehension. Jesus how misinformed can you possibly be.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Epidemiology is doing the work and research. Epidemiologists do not have a monopoly on interpreting the data they compile
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well their recommendations have been pretty bad during the pandemic so maybe they deserve a little bit of skepticism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
